Measure, improve and prove AI fluency across your company.

AI fluency is the demonstrated ability to work with AI effectively, critically and safely in real work, and to know when not to use it. It goes beyond AI literacy, which is knowing about AI, to what people actually do with it. AISA measures it across five dimensions: Prompting & Communication, Critical Thinking, Technical Understanding, Workflow & Application, and Safety & Responsibility.

An AI fluency assessment measures how well each employee actually uses AI at work. AISA runs it as a 20 to 40 minute conversation with exercises, taken in each person’s own time. Every answer is scored from evidence against a published rubric, calibrated and integrity-checked, and produces an AISA AI Fluency Score™ from 0 to 100 that rolls up into team, function and organization results.

Each person talks with Aisa, an AI interviewer, about how they really use AI, and shows it in short exercises. AISA scores 11 skills from that evidence against a published rubric, so every score traces back to what the person said and did. Results roll up automatically into team, function and organization analytics.

AI literacy is knowing what AI is and how it works. AI fluency is using it well: briefing it, checking what it produces, building it into real work and using it safely. Most AI literacy tests measure knowledge or self-ratings. AISA measures demonstrated fluency, and covers all 25 sub-competencies of the US Department of Labor’s AI Literacy Framework along the way.

Yes. Invite candidates to take the assessment and receive a full AI fluency report before you decide: a 0–100 score, five dimension scores, an AI persona and quoted evidence from the conversation. Every session is checked for answers that are not the candidate’s own.

Every organization gets an offer built around the number of people, the length of the programme and the add-ons you choose. Start a demo and we’ll put one together for you.

Yes. It measures how people work with AI in any role, from finance and operations to engineering, and adjusts its technical depth to the person. People can answer by typing or by voice, and assessments taken in other languages score as high as those taken in English.

An organization-wide AI fluency score, team and function breakdowns, AI fluency analytics (fluency tiers, a skill heatmap, coverage, champions and sceptics, and the AI Enthusiasm Score), a learning roadmap and pre/post measurement, in one dashboard every admin shares. Each person also receives their own full report, which stays private to them, and a certificate.

AI fluency is the multiplier on everything you have spent on AI: the tools only pay off when people use them well. Self-reports overstate skill, too: professionals overrate their own AI ability by 18.5 points on average. Measuring AI fluency shows where the gaps are, by person, team and function, so AI training goes where it moves the most.

Measure first, then train where the gaps are. The learning roadmap shows which dimensions and skills each team needs most, every person receives a growth plan built from their own results, and the optional AI Coach add-on delivers daily coaching on WhatsApp. Re-assess after training to show what moved.

Yes. Questions adapt to each person, but every score is given against the same criteria and the same published rubric, and every score is tied to quoted evidence. Two people who had different conversations are measured on the same scale.

No. Scores rest on what people have actually done and shown, including in hands-on exercises, not on how polished they sound. The scoring credits people whose demonstrated skill runs ahead of how they describe it.

Every session is integrity-checked for answers that are not the person’s own, and follow-up questions test whether people can explain and build on what they said. Flags appear in the report, and no certificate is issued for flagged work.

98% of people who retake AISA land in the same or an adjacent tier, and scores correlate at r = 0.79 between attempts. The method is designed to the AERA/APA/NCME Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing and to ISO 10667, the international standard for assessment service delivery.

A basic AI literacy test is quick to build. A behavioural, conversational assessment with a score that is accurate, reliable and trusted is a much bigger job. AISA has been refined over about 50 iterations and 3,000+ assessments, on a published rubric, with integrity checks on every session and an organization dashboard that is ready now. Every hour spent perfecting a tool is an hour not spent on your people.

No need to throw that work away. An internal test shows what people know; the AISA Score adds what they can do, on a benchmarked scale. In the demo we look at what you have already measured and plan the rollout around it.