AI fluency is the ability to work with AI effectively, safely, and adaptably, across tools, across contexts, and under ambiguity. It also includes AI judgement: knowing when, and how, not to use AI.According to aisa.to
Like a language
Concepts
What AI is and is not. How it fails.
Then
Basics
Asking well. Checking what comes back.
Then
Skills
Working with it every day, in your role, at your stakes.
aisa.to/ai-fluency. Literacy is reading. Fluency is writing and speaking.
3 · The dimensions
What makes a good driver
The reference framework for driver training across the EU, the GDE matrixDriving competence · Hatakka et al., 2002
1
Vehicle manoeuvring
2
Mastery of traffic situations
3
Goals and context of driving
4
Goals for life and skills for living
AI fluency · the AISA rubric
1
Prompting & Communication
2
Critical Thinking
3
Technical Understanding
4
Workflow & Application
5
Safety & Responsibility
Goals for Driver Education (GDE) matrix, from the EU GADGET project: Hatakka, Keskinen, Gregersen, Glad & Hernetkoski (2002), Transportation Research Part F, 5(3), 201–215. AISA rubric: 5 dimensions, 11 criteria, aisa.to/resources/the-aisa-rubric.
3 · The dimensions
Five dimensions, eleven skills
PROMPTING
Prompting & Communication
Handling the machine
Prompt design
Iterative dialogue
Context & memory management
Average 44.5 / 100
JUDGEMENT
Critical Thinking
Reading the road
Output evaluation
Limitation awareness
Average 42.6 / 100
UNDERSTANDING
Technical Understanding
Knowing the vehicle
AI fundamentals
Tool landscape
Average 39.2 / 100
APPLICATION
Workflow & Application
The journey
Workflow integration
Task decomposition
Domain application
Average 47.6 / 100
RESPONSIBILITY
Safety & Responsibility
The person
AI safety & responsibility
Average 41.2 / 100
Averages across 2,752 AISA assessments.
A side note · what AISA is
How AISA works
What we measure
The five dimensions you just saw. Eleven criteria. One fixed, published rubric.
How we measure it
A twenty-minute conversation with Aisa. Not a quiz, not a survey. A second AI scores every answer as you talk; a third calibrates the result.
aisa.toThe conversationThe report
2,752 assessmentsReport and certificate free
4 · Good and bad · a short game
One post, four drivers
One request, “help me write a social media post promoting our event”, lands with four people scoring 34, 55, 70 and 85. You say how you would do it first. Then we climb.
2,752 AISA assessments. Personas placed at their average score.
Measurement · who you might be
Ten AI personas
050100
85–100
The Oracle
Understands AI at its core, not just how to use it.
80–100
The Architect
Builds highly complex integrated systems using AI.
65–80
The Conductor
Orchestrates AI across the workflow, not just within it.
60–80
The Builder
Has actually built something with AI.
55–70
The Tactician
Gets things done with AI, fast and reliably.
35–55
The Enthusiast
Curious, capable, and picking up speed.
22–55
The Sceptic
Questions everything: the output, the tool, the hype.
22–35
The Copy-Paster
Uses AI regularly. Takes the output at face value.
10–40
The Dabbler
Tries things out. Hasn’t locked in a rhythm yet.
0–10
The Bystander
AI is on the radar, but not in the routine.
A persona is assigned by the shape of your profile across the five dimensions. The ranges are typical scores, not hard bounds.
5 · What should you do to be a good driver?
The map: from here to fluent
Your 5 tools to master AI (and any other skill).
6 · Future look
Role based averages
Average dimension score (0–100) by role, roles with 50+ assessments, across 2,752 AISA assessments. Role taken from the candidate’s own job title. Darker is lower.
6 · Future look · a working view
Role AI fluency archetypes *experimental
The minimum profile a role needs, not what people score today.
Prompting
Critical Thinking
Technical
Workflow
Safety
Why
Marketing & Content
Copy goes out under a client’s name. Taste and checking are the job.
Sales & Partnerships
Lead handling is a pipeline. Wiring the tools together is where the time goes.
Legal & Compliance
The cost of a wrong answer is highest here. Knowing when not to use AI is the skill.
must be strong solid baseline
Our working view of where each role needs to be, drawn from how the work gets used and who it reaches. To be tested against the role averages as the data grows.
7 · What people tell us before they start
Five points of insight.
Every person answers one research question before the assessment begins. One question at a time, retired at 100 answers, across 2,752 assessments so far.
Question A · Asked 20–25 Aug 2026 · n = 100
AHas AI changed the way you think about your job?
Not at all
7%
A little
15%
Meaningfully
36%
Fundamentally
31%
I'm still figuring that out
11%
Two thirds say AI has changed how they think about their job meaningfully or fundamentally.
One answer per person, chosen before the assessment. Options shown in the order they were asked.
Question B · Asked 25–31 Aug 2026 · n = 100
BHow do you typically learn about new AI capabilities?
Social media
37%
Colleagues
13%
Newsletters
6%
I experiment myself
37%
I don't actively follow it
7%
Social media and self-experiment tie at 37 each. Newsletters barely register.
One answer per person, chosen before the assessment. Options shown in the order they were asked.
Question C · Asked 7–13 Sep 2026 · n = 100
CDo you think AI skills should be a factor in hiring decisions?
Definitely yes
60%
Probably yes
22%
Neutral
12%
Probably not
3%
Definitely not
3%
82 in 100 say AI skills should count in hiring. Six say no.
One answer per person, chosen before the assessment. Options shown in the order they were asked.
Question D · Asked from 21 Sep 2026, still collecting · n = 36
DWhat's the AI skill you most want to develop next?
Prompt engineering
22%
Building AI agents or automations
50%
Evaluating AI output critically
11%
Understanding AI architecture
14%
Knowing when NOT to use AI
3%
Half want to build agents or automations. Knowing when not to use AI: one person so far.
One answer per person, chosen before the assessment. Options shown in the order they were asked.
Question E · Asked before Jul 2026 · n = 190
EWhat's your AI hot take?
AI will fundamentally transform most jobs within 5 years
47%
AI is genuinely useful but won't replace people
34%
AI is overhyped — the reality doesn't match the buzz
2%
I'm more concerned about AI's risks than excited about its potential
7%
I don't have a strong view yet — still forming my opinion
10%
Nearly half expect AI to transform most jobs within five years. Two in 100 call it overhyped.
One answer per person, chosen before the assessment. Options shown in the order they were asked.
Optional · how I use AI
An example from my workflow
Every morning, I talk to her
Iris, the desk assistant
A skill I open at the start of the day, /desk. Iris is a persona with her own charter and her own memory.
She reads six desk files, and nothing else: to-do, rolodex, waiting-on, reminders, notebook, whiteboard. Never the code.
She sequences the to-dos so they get done. Sized to 10–15 minutes, the easiest start first, ordered for the most satisfying run of closes: four to six a block.
She is built in concentric circles. Her charter, who she is and how she works, comes before her tasks; her memory wraps around both. The character is set first, the work happens inside it.
She learns on her own. Every session she records what she did well and what she did not, and writes it to her memory, so the next morning starts further along.
The 70 move from the game: context built once, reused every morning, and it improves on its own.
Before you go
AI is not a self‑driving car.
It needs a good driver.
Q&A
Complete the assessment to see your report, and start the AI Fluency Voyage game.